Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Module 5 Case Reflec...
1) What would be your position if you were a member of Dr. Sabankwa’s cabinet? As a member of Dr. Sabankwa’s cabinet, I would advise him to accept the IMF plan since at this point althoug...

Module 5 Case Reflection Paper
Module 5 Case Reflection Paper

1) What would be your position if you were

Mod 4 Graded Exam_ B...
synovial

module 4 graded exam
module 4 graded exam

synovial

M7 Assignment 1 Disc...
In one of my previous organizations, the business was about retail management on a small-scale. Our company used to sell retail products. I was a junior employee and used to contact the vendors and ex...

M7 Assignment 1 Discussion
M7 Assignment 1 Discussion

In one of my previous organizations, the business

Unit 5-Forum

Unit 5-Forum

Q Read: Lambert v. Barron 974 So.2d 198 in LEXIS or Nexis-Uni [Textbook ref: Problem 5, page 361] also at, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1241354.html Do you agree or disagree with the decision in the Lambert case. Explain by making EXPLICIT reference to any of the principles of Contract Law (say which one(s) you are using) that are in the Chapter. Please refer to at least some principles, and cite the page number that they are on, in order to receive a satisfactory score.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
Yes, I do agree with the decision stated in the Lambert case because no such contract was actually established amid Barron and Lambert. Basically, the kind of arrangement that was made amid both the parties was kind of “Friend helping a friend” as well as no such significant advantage was actually received by Barron. Considering the reference to agree with court’s ruling; • No such contract was formed amid Barron and Lambert. • In comparison to the oral agreement case of supra,Chaisson v. Chaisson, is where no son were being rejected from oral agreement with the parents who are accepting educational loan agreement.