Yes, I do agree with the decision stated in the Lambert case because no such contract was actually established amid Barron and Lambert. Basically, the kind of arrangement that was made amid both the parties was kind of “Friend helping a friend” as well as no such significant advantage was actually received by Barron. Considering the reference to agree with court’s ruling; • No such contract was formed amid Barron and Lambert. • In comparison to the oral agreement case of supra,Chaisson v. Chaisson, is where no son were being rejected from oral agreement with the parents who are accepting educational loan agreement.